Certifiable: IT certifications lose some of
their allure
IT certifications are
everywhere, but what do they really prove?
News Story by Mary K.
Pratt
SEPTEMBER 05, 2005 (COMPUTERWORLD) - Boston
Medical Center and Boston-based Partners HealthCare Systems
Inc. hire entry-level technical workers through Atlantic
Associates Inc. Both organizations look for similar qualities
in their new hires, but there's one telling difference: Boston
Medical Center specifically seeks to employ workers with
certifications such as A+ and Microsoft Certified
Professional. "We think it's an indicator of professionalism
and dedication to the industry," says Darren Dworkin, chief
technology officer at Boston Medical Center. While Dworkin
stops short of calling certifications a requirement, he says
he uses them to differentiate between candidates.
Carlo Severo, who manages the help desk at Partners,
sees certification as a bonus but not necessarily a
differentiator. "I have people with certification and without.
I would challenge you to tell me who was which," he says.
So, who has it right, Dworkin or Severo? Can
certifications really tell something about the people who hold
them, or are they minor points on resumes today?
Downward Slide
Lately, certifications
seem to have lost some of their allure. A study by Foote
Partners LLC, a research firm in New Canaan, Conn., shows that
for the 12-month period that ended April 1, noncertified
workers received a larger average pay increase than those with
certifications -- 3.6% compared with 2.9%.
Some say
the study shows a shift in the value IT executives place on
certifications.
"It's being put in its right place,"
says Robert Miano, president and CEO of Harvey Nash USA, the
U.S. arm of London-based Harvey Nash PLC, a global recruitment
company. "Certifications are going to stay, but they're not as
highly regarded as they have been in the past."
Miano
says he has seen a change in the way the market treats
certifications, which were initially well received. He says
they have become "watered-down and diluted" as the number of
certifications and third-party teaching centers has grown.
Certification exams have also become less stringent, he says.
"What has happened is the value of certification has
gone down because you can get it so easily," he adds.
"Companies realize that certification isn't as meaningful as
it used to be."
As a result, Miano says, his clients
put a higher value on experience.
William Butler, an
IT technician at the Gilmer Independent School District in
Gilmer, Texas, has also seen this shift during his nearly 20
years in IT. "Certification at one point was a standard that
could be used to gauge an individual's proficiency. That was
in the early years," he says. Now most certifications are
awarded by vendors and "seem to be more of a vehicle to
promote their products."
Butler has no certifications;
he says he has relied on his reputation to advance his career.
Jerry Luftman, associate dean of graduate IT programs
at Stevens Institute of Technology in Hoboken, N.J., and an
officer of the Society for Information Management (SIM) in
Chicago, also downplays the value of certifications.
"I would certainly weigh experience as much more
valuable than a score on an exam," Luftman says, adding that
he sees IT employers increasingly seeking out marketing,
communication and leadership skills that aren't measured by
any exam.
The Foote research "certainly suggests that
one should question the merits of the certifications," says
Luftman. "But again, is technology the only criteria a manager
uses to give pay increases? No."
Others agree that job
offers and compensation ought to be based on factors ranging
from experience to attitude. "There are other key criteria
you're not going to get through certification," says Stephen
Pickett, CIO at Penske Corp. in Bloomfield Hills, Mich., and
president-elect of SIM.
And Pickett confirms the Foote
study's findings that people with certification don't
necessarily command higher pay: "I'm going to pay the same
money for the same base knowledge," he says.
That's
why many say experience is the real key. "If you have someone
with experience but no certification vs. someone with
certification but no experience, you're going to take the
person with experience," says Jack Harrington, president of
Atlantic Associates, a Boston-based firm specializing in IT
staffing and consulting.
Brian Ellis, a network
analyst working as a part-time contractor at Massachusetts
General Hospital, is a good case in point. Ellis is a
Microsoft Certified Professional and holds A+ and N+
certifications. He says he considered going for the Microsoft
Certified Systems Engineer certification but opted against it.
"I have five years as a systems engineer with Microsoft
products. I don't feel like I need to prove that I can pass a
test," he says.
Ellis adds that he's busy enough --
and well compensated -- with his work at MGH and as an owner
of a Concerto Networks Inc. franchise in Stoneham, Mass. "I
will probably never get certified in anything else," he says.
"Continuing education is important. It's absolutely important.
But I'm not a big fan of certifications."
On the
Other Hand
Not everyone shares Ellis' views. In
fact, some managers still place a high value on IT
certifications. Pickett says many IT managers see
certifications as a sign of a self-starter who is willing to
learn. He says that when he reviews entry-level candidates who
have just a few years of work experience, certifications are
"a good differentiator, but not the final decision."
Certifications are also valuable for midlevel
professionals charged with very specific duties, he adds.
That's when Microsoft, Oracle or Cisco certifications are
desirable -- though they're still no substitute for experience
on those vendors' systems.
Though some managers claim
that experience trumps certifications, Harrington says his
clients still prefer to see certifications on applicants'
resumes. Clients particularly want certifications in newer
technologies, such as Linux, and they're willing to pay for
them. "It is a good selling tool if you're certified,"
Harrington says.
Sharyle Doherty, vice president of
product management at The Ultimate Software Group Inc. in
Weston, Fla., sought someone with a security-related
certification when the company created a security analyst
position. "We look at certifications as an indicator that
someone has gone the extra mile to prove their experience in a
certain field," says Doherty.
When Doherty couldn't
find a certified security expert, she sent an in-house worker
for certification to fill the new position. The worker was
compensated for the training. "We consider it an
accomplishment and something to reward her for," Doherty says.
So the verdict? IT certifications are neither a
guaranteed money magnet nor a guaranteed waste of time. They
may indicate drive as well as knowledge, but they can't
measure experience or non-IT skills. Executives, hiring
managers and workers at all levels conclude that it's best to
consider them as just one part of the overall picture. "If
[job candidates] aren't certified, it's not going to prevent
them from being hired. It's more of an added bonus," Doherty
says. "But you still have to check into their actual job
experience -- that it's not just book knowledge, that it's
knowledge they can apply."
| |
|